My swan song
May 5, 2021
As I step down from my role as faculty adviser to The Carroll News, the editors have graciously allowed me to write a column (not usually a faculty privilege in this news outlet) looking back over my three years with the campus newspaper and issuing some warnings about the paper’s future.
First, a few words about the role of the adviser (and yes, that spelling is correct in Associated Press style). My job is to guide, but not to direct or censor, the work of the student editors who run the paper. Decision-making power resides with them.
When I first assumed this role in August 2018, this was a prodigious challenge for me. As a professor, I’m accustomed to having authority over what my students write about and how they behave in my classes. I’m used to an attitude of deference, and to students generally following my advice if they want to do well in my courses. And in the professional newsrooms where I’d worked, people scrupulously followed the guidance of senior officials like the publisher, who was not a line editor but had ultimate power. I clearly did not have that authority at The Carroll News. Decisions on what stories and topics to cover, whether and when to publish stories, when to remove or rephrase problematic statements, whether to contact sources I thought were crucial to our coverage, were entirely theirs. I could only advise and, particularly at the start, my advice was often ignored.
My first year, 2018-19, was tumultuous, largely due to a gifted columnist who attracted many readers but did not follow the university’s mission to respect the worth and dignity of every person. In an inflammatory style that is widely used in the news media today, this columnist wrote on many important issues, but did so in a way that mocked and vilified those with different points of view and lifestyles. At first, I thought this was fair game. I had worked at a major daily newspaper with columnists for whom this type of rhetoric was their stock-in-trade.
One vivid memory from that first year took place in the spring semester, when the Student Union invited The Carroll News to defend its free-speech-above-all policy during a special meeting with the LGBTQIA+ Allies, whose members had been attacked repeatedly by our columnist. Sitting in the audience, I was at the edge of the Carroll News delegation, right beside the Allies. My heart and spirit were in both groups simultaneously. To my right were students like one of my family members, a lesbian, whom I love deeply. Many had been my students, including the eloquent Emmanuel (Mannie) Brown, who spoke courageously, describing the harm done to LGBTQIA+ students by our columnist’s rhetoric and insults. Right next to me, a young person trembled constantly with fear – I wondered if this was their first public appearance as an LGBTQIA+ person. I felt and shared their pain. To my left were the Carroll News journalists I knew and loved, defending free speech, about which I care deeply. Our Editor-in-Chief Olivia Shackleton spoke well, defending the right of columnists to write their opinions and the newspaper’s job to defend them, even when many of us disagreed with their views. Despite this, more than one elected SU senator denounced one particular column as “hate speech.”
Throughout this crisis, which brought significant public attention to the University, I am proud to say that there was no censorship by the administration. But there were many meetings! I am grateful to our retired Vice President for Student Affairs Mark McCarthy as well as the current VP for Mission and Identity Ed Peck and Legal Counsel Colleen Treml (once a campus newspaper editor herself) for their patient education of the entire Carroll News editing team about the University’s Jesuit mission. Rather than caustic, divisive, incendiary rhetoric, we learned, we should strive always to be inclusive and respectful of every person. Since this is a principle I have long held sacred, I was grateful to find a way to uphold it while still respecting journalistic free expression. It is the way you say things, not the views you express, that matters.
As a result of this 2018-19 crisis, we spent many months revising the Carroll News Staff Manual to make the University’s mission and its principles stronger and clearer. We issued an apology to the LGBTQIA+ community — actually, there were two: the first in April 2019, signed by the new Editor-in-Chief Kathleen Mackey and myself; the second in November 2020 from the entire staff. We resolved to be more careful, not censoring our writers’ views, but ensuring that they were consistently respectful of alternate points of view. Not the content, just the rhetoric changed.
In the two years that followed, there were uproars of a different nature. We wrote many stories challenging administration policies: on the cancellation of the annual drag show, on the administration’s determination to use “academic prioritization” to shift resources from “weak” to “strong” departments, on the elimination of the Art History department and the firing of two tenured professors without cause, and on decisions by the Board of Directors to gut and make meaningless the concept and practice of tenure at John Carroll. We also covered the pandemic and its huge impact on the lives of students and of the University. Throughout, The Carroll News documented and investigated these events and issues tirelessly, bringing out the best in our student journalists and attracting new readers and their loyalty.
In 2020, our readership rose because the pandemic forced us completely online, where we discovered a large new audience of alumni, relatives and friends of John Carroll and the longstanding “Student Voice of John Carroll University” — our former motto as a newspaper. Readership remained strong because of our student journalists’ clear and truthful writing.
However, I must issue a warning about the future. In the past three years, The Carroll News has had the benefit of a tenured faculty adviser, one with long experience as a professional journalist. We do not know if the new adviser will have these attributes. So far, we have no word on whether there will even be a new adviser – we know only that I have been forbidden to continue in that role, even though I will still be at John Carroll. I am on step-down retirement and will teach only one course in 2021-22. You might think The Carroll News could be considered that one course, but I have been told it will not.
Suddenly, this year, there’s a new policy at the University that there will be no “course release” for tenured faculty who take on this 20-hour-a-week advisory role. This is a looming threat to The Carroll News editorial independence. Our tenured faculty are already overloaded — a load that has been increasing as the University reduced the number of tenure-track positions and replaced them with contingent, part-time faculty on short-term contracts. This has led to a much higher administrative burden on the tenured few who remain, as well as precarity and other injustices to contingent faculty. (See my writing on that issue here.) In the case of The Carroll News, this means it is very likely that the new adviser will be someone in that contingent faculty group, with no protections should there be a story that the administration doesn’t like. And believe me, this happens frequently.
This is tied to the concept of “academic freedom” that we have written about as the tenure crisis unfolded this year at John Carroll. Without the protection of tenure — only the Orwellian remnant that has been left to us, using the same word to mean something entirely different — professors can be fired at any time, for any reason, without an appeal process. So, whether the new Carroll News adviser is tenured or not, that person could be forced to step down any time the administration doesn’t like what’s written. Even the threat of that is likely to chill investigative journalism and opinion columns critical of the administration because it could get a beloved adviser fired.
As you may have noticed, The Carroll News has set a high standard in this and previous years, writing the truth about what’s going on at John Carroll. Many readers have told us, this year especially, that they turn to The Carroll News to find out what’s really going on at John Carroll. Do you want an adviser who can be fired for encouraging that truth-telling? Please let us know what you think in the comments section below or in letters to the editor.
Leona Johnson • May 7, 2021 at 5:48 am
Carrie has been a mentor and support to me while I was professional journalist. It saddens me to read this for many reasons. Future journalists will not learn from one of the best instructor’s and journalist’s in the field.
The experience and expertise you bring is lost to many in this day and age.
As for the JCU, like many colleges/universities, their priorities no longer lie with providing the best education to it’s students. By not having experienced, tenured staff to guide the students and other faculty you are at risk of having students being truly unprepared for the workforce.
As an HR Professional and a mentor to diverse students, I help students to learn beyond the books, to do internships to hone your skills and define their work ethic and style to be prepared for the workforce.
Having been the Editor the Cleveland Stater at Cleveland State University, I leaned heavily on my adviser for guidance. Dr. Anup Kumar, like Carrie, a professional journalist, was invaluable. Even after graduation, I had to occasion to reach out to them to ensure the approach I was going to use was the correct approach.
I pray The Carroll News will continue to choose to stand for integrity and to write in a manner that exemplifies the true principles of journalists who came before.
LYJ
Jerry Masek • May 6, 2021 at 2:11 pm
Carrie B’s impact on journalism extends far beyond JCU. She is the latest in a long line of outstanding people to guide and advise journalists through leadership in the award-winning Cleveland Pro Chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ). If she has to step down, so be it. But please, Mr. Administrator, listen to her opinions and seek her advice on the future of the newspaper. JCU students pay top dollar for their education. For that, and for the reputation of the University, it is in the best interest of all concerned to maintain the integrity of the student newspaper.
I believe that if the late, great Dr. Hendrickson were alive today, he would gladly co-sign this comment.
Dr. B, now it is time for all of us to B thankful for your service to journalism.
Aiden Keenan • May 5, 2021 at 7:40 pm
Thank you so much for this wonderful column and for the excellent job you have done in this (to use your spelling) adviser role. I have seen The Carroll News become a more legitimate watchdog for the well-being of the University over the last few semesters, and I am deeply grateful for that. In reference to your concern of a possible decline in the quality of TCN reportings, I recognize this difficult situation as the exact time when the University must formally recognize The Carroll News as a public forum. The University claims that academic freedom, research, and independent investigative reporting will not decline as a result of their handbook amendments from March 2021. Even if this were the truth, the identification of this platform as a public forum would ensure that it remains a student voice that reports on the events that students, faculty, and the greater JCU community must be aware of.
Daniel May • May 5, 2021 at 5:56 pm
Dr. B I speak for many Carroll News alums and myself when I say thank you for everything. I know that The Carroll News and your classes were what got me into writing, and is why I’m now an Editor at a website I’ve written for well over two years.
Zach M • May 5, 2021 at 5:13 pm
University leadership, namely the Board of Directors, is driving JCU off a cliff – and the whole world now sees it. It’s an embarrassment to alums everywhere, and it’s a disgrace to the faculty who have earned their tenure and due respect. Forcing Dr. B out of her role as adviser does a disservice to JCU’s journalism students and, in turn, negatively impacts the community as a whole who will now be less informed by a less prepared student journalist staff. As a former Carroll News EIC, Tim Russert’s name on the Department of Communications played a large role in my decision to attend JCU. However, the decision to eliminate faculty tenure will undoubtedly dissuade the next Tim Russert from attending JCU; instead, they’ll find a University which values their faculty, students and education as a whole. The Board of Directors should be ashamed of themselves.