Art History Department to be eliminated, tenured faculty receive termination notices
Sep 16, 2020
The Art History Department has been dissolved effective August 31, 2021. Two tenured faculty members in the department, Bo Liu and Gerry Guest, have received termination letters and have been told they will lose their positions once that date arrives.
“It would be an understatement to say that the faculty are outraged over this,” Philosophy professor Simon Fitzpatrick, JCU chapter president of the American Association of University Professors, told The Carroll News. “It’s a complete violation of our contract and it’s a complete violation of our principles governing tenure. … What’s happening is basically a threat to the very idea of tenure.”
After a very brief process in August, a committee of deans and faculty recommended the termination of the Art History Department but not the two faculty members. The committee was composed of three deans and four faculty members. The faculty selected were proposed to the Provost and Academic Vice President Steven Herbert by either the Faculty Executive Council or the three deans on the council. Herbert then selected the faculty members to serve on the committee.
“Appointed faculty members are not true representatives, they can’t represent the faculty because they haven’t been chosen by the faculty to represent them,” Fitzpatrick said.
The committee voted unanimously to eliminate the Art History Department. However, the committee also voted unanimously to maintain the art history minor and relocate the tenured faculty members to different departments.
The University did not follow the committee’s recommendation and instead dissolved the department and fired Liu and Guest. Both professors were notified that their department and positions were being reviewed on Aug. 22, and they received their termination notice on Aug. 27. Those terminations were announced on Aug. 31 during a faculty meeting, which was also the last day for permanent faculty changes for the 2020-2021 academic year.
“Essentially in doing this [termination], the administration violated The Faculty Handbook in multiple areas,” Fitzpatrick added. “And the Faculty Handbook Committee and Faculty Council are on record here confirming that too, so it’s not just the AAUP who are agreeing with this.”
The Faculty Handbook, which is considered a contract for faculty, states that “termination occurs because of discontinuance of a department or program, because of financial exigency, for medical reasons, or by dismissal for cause.”
The administration did not follow proper procedure when conducting the terminations, according to Fitzpatrick. Though the department was dissolved, The Faculty Handbook states that “efforts shall first be made to relocate each affected Faculty member within the University.”
The professors were terminated only five days after being notified that their department was under review. Additionally, multiple departments said they had space for both Liu and Guest.
Liu said, “This year [looks pretty difficult]. Teaching online is already consuming a lot of time, and now I need to find another job.”
Liu is considering taking legal action. A GoFundMe page has been set up by other faculty members to cover Liu and Guest’s legal fees and has raised just over $5,000.
Faculty and alumni have rallied around Liu and Guest. Three letters have been sent to the administration, all demanding that the professors be reinstated. During a faculty meeting with the provost, many professors blacked out their Zoom screens and posted a note in support of Liu and Guest.
“The important thing to remember about tenure is that the purpose of it is to protect academic freedom,” Fitzpatrick added. “So the reason that faculty members have tenure … is so that we’re in a position to have the freedom to do academic work that serves the public good. If we were sort of ‘at will’ employees who could be fired at any time for any reason … then we don’t have true academic freedom.”
In addition to recommending cutting the Art History program, the committee recommended that the University cut the Asian Studies program, the master’s in Humanities and the master’s degree in Mathematics for high school teachers. The University has not yet decided on the second part of the committee’s recommendation.
“There’s a lot that will go on this semester and maybe next semester, as people try to fight for them to stay at the University and to be relocated into other departments. We do not believe that Art History will remain as a department regardless,” concluded Brent Brossmann, chair of Faculty Council.
The Carroll News reached out to the University administration and to Herbert individually, but they did not respond to repeated requests for their comments.
Lisa Minn • Sep 26, 2020 at 1:38 pm
This is terrible! I am currently involved in a program at my kids’ school called Art In Motion. We show them famous works of art and facilitate discussions that are meant to teach them visual thinking strategies. It always makes me think of how much I loved my Art History 101 at JCU. I was a science major but felt very lucky to have a broad-based liberal arts education. How very disappointing to hear that this department is being eliminated and also to read about the manner in which these professors were dismissed.
Bryan Nicholson • Sep 24, 2020 at 11:27 am
Wow, this is stunning news. Cutting art history and Asian studies. Good thing the Catholic Church (and the Jesuit order) never played a strong role in art or Asia over the last 500 years; otherwise, this would be a catastrophe.
Kassie Schelling • Sep 23, 2020 at 7:16 am
As a recently retired high school art teacher, I can’t even imagine not having art history in college, let alone not being able to use my knowledge of art to better teach my students. This is a travesty on so many levels. How can you purport to be a liberal arts university without this key area of study? The fact that two tenured faculty couldn’t be adsorbed into the other departments is shameful.
Maria Knepshield • Sep 22, 2020 at 1:43 pm
As a senior Art History minor, this news is most discouraging to me. I can confidently say that my skills as a young professional have been shaped by the various art history classes I have taken. Contrary to what some might think, art history is not just looking at pieces of art and memorizing title lines. In art history, you analyze pieces of work ranging from painting, sculpture, and architecture, and critically interpret the historical context of different pieces. From studying art history, you gain skills in research, communication, analysis, and critical thinking. Not only does studying art history make you a valuable asset in any career field, but it introduces you to cultural diversity in a way few college courses can. To dissolve our art history department and to terminate our tenured faculty members is a grave mistake John Carroll is making. Not only are you hurting your faculty, you’re hurting your students.
I’ve taken an art history course each semester since my freshman year, many with Dr. Guest and Dr. Liu. Dr. Guest and Dr. Liu have taught both academically challenging and enriching courses while maintaining a close relationship with their students. Each course, there are always some students who have never taken an art history class. It can be difficult to critically analyze art if you’ve never been exposed to it before. To surpass this learning curve, Dr. Guest and Dr. Liu provide engaging lectures with activities (such as drawing to put ourselves in the position of the artist) along with numerous trips to the Cleveland Museum of Art to experience art in person. Having professors that go out of their way to help students understand is a blessing and terminating them after the years they have spent supporting students at John Carroll is outrageous.
How can we pride ourselves on being a liberal arts college when there is no apparent concern for the arts? I’ve always had a deep love for John Carroll, but this decision is more than disappointing. I’m very curious what they plan to do with our current freshman, sophomore, and junior art history major and minors. I’m sure Case Western would be more than happy to accept them in their art history program.
William James Weaver • Sep 22, 2020 at 1:15 pm
The treatment of Professors Liu and Guest represents a transformation of the relationship between the administration and the faculty, across the University. Faculty now knows that they are not considered stakeholders, but merely resources to be spent at the pleasure of the administration.
What is worse is the decision to close the Art History Department, and not to retain the minor (and the courses). I fear this to be an act of signature significance with regard to the character of the University’s current governance.
John Carroll carries a deep, inescapable ethical obligation to promote, protect, and preserve the humanities, even with the full expectation that the University incurs a financial loss by doing so.
The humanities are not to be discarded like a consumer product line that undersells for a season. They are to be guarded like a candleflame against the winds of time and forgetfulness, because that is the civilizational function of a University.
Caroline Maltese • Sep 20, 2020 at 9:02 pm
Devastating news during a time of seemingly endless bitter news. Great reporting Sophia and Rachel!
Arielle Cooley • Sep 20, 2020 at 2:42 pm
How important, Edward Mohler, is art?
I’m a biologist. I say, very important. My biology students benefit every single year from the different kinds of learning that they gain from art history classes.
Julie Learson • Sep 20, 2020 at 11:24 am
Edward Mohler,
better questions:
– Which departments/programs were represented by the faculty on the committee? Were any of them from the arts?
– The school currently offers 95 programs of study to some 3300 students. Of the ~400 teaching faculty, roughly 1/3 is full-time, while 2/3 is part-time. How does eliminating 2 tenured professors and 1 major/minor enhance the learning environment students?
– What is the budgetary savings of eliminating 2 tenured positions? (Wouldn’t accepting 4-6 more students pay for those positions?!) Are there really no other cost-saving measures to implement?
– What does a liberal arts university look like without an art history program?
– How will this impact current students, potential future enrollees, the community, and the school’s rankings?
Patricia • Sep 17, 2020 at 10:07 am
Go Fund Me:
https://gf.me/u/yvs7db
Edward Mohler • Sep 16, 2020 at 3:32 pm
How many art history majors are there?